This new green technology e-cat fusion seems to be at the end of its bumpy twenty year journey of controversy and improbability. Realizing the possibility this technology can open up to the world population, Rossi blog followers have grown more restless than ever and are demanding answers to burning questions. Finally some of them were answered recently by Andrea Rossi himself.
Many are interested to know who the big players are that purchased entire e-cat fusion plants. In relation to it another question answered by Rossi was,:” You recently stated you have signed a contract with the first “normal” customer, when do you think you will be able to publish their name?”
Rossi reply was very logic and understandable. ” As soon as possible, when the Customer will allow it. Consider that when the name of a Customer of us is published, he is buried under thousands of inquiries, emails, insults, together with good considerations. It is not an issue as easy as you can think. We all need to work in peace, and we have an army of enemies who want to forbid this. Among them the wannabe “third parties who have to make a real test.”
We need to remember that Rossi had to enter a rat race to come out on top since he does not hold the U.S. patent for this e-cat fusion device and competitors such as DEFKALION and private parties like Anhern have applied for the U.S cold fusion patent and are targeting to launch their versions of cold fusion devices as well.
The main aspect that should be focused on is that we need or must have green energy technology to heal an environment that has been tested for it capability of handling pollution. So making an initially investment as either a corporation or a private cold fusion user is a scarifies that we should personally commit too.
Related posts:
You need to work on your titles. This article has nothing to do with the price being 50% cheaper as the title states. Where’s the support for that title?
@Alan Sterling – There was a mixup in the draft section of our posts and the article was published with a wrong title. Error corrected. Thank you for the note and sorry for the inconvenience.